Developing a persona and allowing it to evolve
When my group settled on affluent dog lovers as our persona, I immediately conjured images of dog owners like Paris Hilton or Parker Posey's character in the movie Best in Show. The idea of the crazy cat or dog lady is pervasive in our culture, and I had to combat some of those stereotypes when approaching our persona. I had dealt with market segmentation and other forms of consumer grouping in previous classes, but prior to this class, I had never worked with personas. In working with Sam and Buck, our persona for the project, I found that the persona approach offered many advantages over a traditional market segmentation. Firstly, the persona made for a far more immersive experience. Market segmentation with traditional methods felt very one dimensional compared to the rich personality developed with the persona approach. Spending time on seeming unimportant details, like the character narrative seemed pointless when we first began the process of creating our persona. However, after working with Sam and Buck over an entire semester I can definitely see the advantage of having a fully developed personality. Because Sam and Buck were so extensively developed, we, as a group were able to better think like Sam and Buck, which helped us greatly in our brainstorming sessions and creating our first prototypes.
The importance of multiple approaches in research
Ethnocentric/Generative methods of research were not something that I was very familiar with before this class. Through the project I gained a better understanding of how to implement generative research methods and the benefits of these methods. For our project, we implemented in home observations and interviews. These experiences assisted our group in understanding how our subjects' dogs were integrated into their lives and how we might be able to help them further integrate their dogs into their already busy schedule. The generative method helped us to have more dynamic conversations with our interviewees. Instead of just asking questions about where their dog slept or ate, we asked them to show us the areas used by their dogs. This helped to inspire new ideas like our doggie pantry and doggie living space. These are things that we might not have thought out had we not made in-home observations. It is became apparent that it is important to utilize multiple methods when doing research. In our second phase of research, we implemented a more traditional approach to assess some of our product features. The first things to go were the doggie living areas and doggie pantries. While in home observations can be very helpful, they need to be backed up with other evidence and research. Apparently people are just not ready for the doggie pantry.
Improving for next year
I'm the type that enjoys a little structure, so if I had a request/complaint I'd like more structure. At the same time though, I understand that the lack of structure is one things that separates this project from other projects that I have done in previous classes. I also enjoyed the creativity that the lack of structure provided and this was something that was felt by my entire group.
Reactions and Reflections
Initially, I felt some frustration with the project. It felt as if we were not making much progress and that we didn't really know where we were supposed to be going. After that initial stage though, things moved very quickly and we soon found our focus. Part of what helped us find our focus was the class updates. It was always very helpful to see what other groups were doing, and get feedback about our group's progress. As a group, we functioned very well together. Group meeting were always exceedingly fun and there were never any real issues or problems.
Well, that's it. It has been a pleasure blogging for this class. I thoroughly enjoyed this class and this project.
The end.